Body of child found in Cannington

radiohead · Post by **radiohead** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 12:08 am

Hmm...

I wonder how long it'll be before some editting takes place.

Ludacris, you can't help but stir the pot can ya?

Donga · Post by **Donga** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 12:25 am

radiohead wrote:Hmm...

I wonder how long it'll be before some editting takes place lol

And Ludacris, you can't help it can ya

Why would editing need to take place?

radiohead · Post by **radiohead** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 12:33 am

Oh nevermind, I was joking anyway.

Just Robo's comment doesn't sound too 'professional'.

But hey, its a public forum and everyone is entitled to say what they wish right?

doogues71 · Post by **doogues71** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 6:19 am

guys check out todays front page of The West.They've shown the monster that killed that little girl.For all of Perth to see.There should be more of it. Name and shame!!

TheDoc · Post by **TheDoc** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 6:57 am

well big bubbas goin to love this bloke

Beachie · Post by **Beachie** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:18 am

If this scumbag is guilty then he deserves everything he's going to get and more but...

I don't agree with giving out his details and photo until he's found guilty in a court of law. What about the presumption of innocence?

There have been quite a few cases of blokes being accused of rape and having their faces splashed across the media then being found not guilty. Imagine what it would do to you and your family if you were accused of such a crime when you were innocent.

uneekwahn · Post by **uneekwahn** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:58 am

yeah, it's never happened before where someone was charged, found guilty and then released due to their actual innocence. </sarcasm>

*cough* Andrew Mallard *cough* Rory Christie *cough*

Post by **vk6hgr** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 10:05 am

Beachie wrote:
I don't agree with giving out his details and photo until he's found guilty in a court of law. What about the presumption of innocence?

Thank you. I'm glad someone finally said this!

Yes, the crime is horrendous and despicable, but until the case goes to trial and the person is found guilty he is presumed to be innocent. Trial by media like this only serves to taint the jury...

Tom · Post by **Tom** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 11:57 am

I bet Tea-bag off Prison Break (on ch 7) would be rubbing his greasy palms together at the thought off seeing this scumbag inside....

Where sex offenders are concerned, the law should be guilty until proven innocent..

Tom

uneekwahn · Post by **uneekwahn** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:05 pm

Sorry guys, I'll refrain from posting information like this in future.

Apologies if it caused any offence.

Post by **gkoutlis** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:19 pm

uneekwahn wrote:Now, I know it doesn't specifically relate to radio scanning, and if any of the mods feel it should be removed, I have no problem with that, so go ahead and do it if required.

This is an email that's floating around today. I'm not usually one to believe this crap, and won't until I have sufficient evidence to substantiate it, but thought I'd throw it out there for debate.

Jason.

"Hello friends
I am just so angry, frustrated and really upset at what has happened at
the Livingston Shopping Centre that I needed to let you all know the
"truth" behind the mongrel murderer.

(Edited by admin - off topic and rumourous)

What the hell was that all about????

Why would someone post something like that on here???? What's going on to our Forum aye???

Post by **Admin** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:26 pm

gkoutlis wrote: What the hell was that all about???? Why would someone post something like that on here???? What's going on to our Forum aye???

Calm down gk. Take a deeep breath

Ludacris · Post by **Ludacris** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 5:19 pm

doogues71 wrote:Ludacris.Whats the soccer got to do with this tragady

Soccers got nothing to do with it, Thats in my signature and is in every
post.

EDIT:WAPOL have just held media conference to put a stop the rumours of that email..

See here it is again...
|
|
|

Robo · Post by **Robo** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 10:25 pm

radiohead wrote:Oh nevermind, I was joking anyway.

Just Robo's comment doesn't sound too 'professional'.

But hey, its a public forum and everyone is entitled to say what they wish right?

Fair point, it was not a professional comment. Just trying to emphasise on the tragedy. If anyone took it the wrong way i am sorry.