Difference with P1 and P2

Post by **gkoutlis** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 10:22 am

just.nosey wrote:248 is not suicide or attempted suicide it is a Check Welfare (URGENT). Reasons for the Urgent Check Welfare could be where a Person has threatend to or is in the Process of Committing Suicide but that is not exclusive to the code.

Another that comes to mind if a child were to tell the police mummy's sleeping on the floor and wont wake up would definitely qualify as a 248 (P2) for at least one vehicle possibly for a 2nd vehicle and SJA would be called also.

110% Correct - I heard an Urgent 248 in Midland this morning where 2 cars went priority after an old lady has fallen down in her home yesterday unable to get up.....So response by WAPOL and SJA did a TOP job there...

TheDoc · Post by **TheDoc** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 3:58 pm

it was a rellie of mine job well done by wapol and sja

Chicky · Post by **Chicky** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 4:00 pm

How is she doing, Doc? Is she ok????

TheDoc · Post by **TheDoc** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 4:01 pm

shes good

Post by **gkoutlis** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 4:01 pm

I heard she was ok - and went to Hospital - so yeah job well done...

Millsy · Post by **Millsy** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 4:17 pm

Chicky wrote:How is she doing, Doc? Is she ok????

Sounds Very Mash style there cindy

Good to hear there ok tho

Chicky · Post by **Chicky** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 4:19 pm

That's the caring nursing style embedded in my brain

lol

Post by **Zebedee** » Mon Jun 19, 2006 7:35 pm

CHEV4EVR wrote:The strong rumour is that the 140kph cap is about to go out the window and more emphasis on time, place and circumstance. Especially when the AVL's come on line in the cars it will certainly make it more accountable.

That's interesting. I'm curious what the opinion is about that from the people on the ground, (or should that be the people in the cars?)

Does that mean the people in the pursuit car would determine for themselves what speeds are appropriate based on the conditions they observe around them? And is that placing an undue extra burden on the officers involved, or is it likely to be better than having someone back in the comms centre who can't see for him/herself what the conditions are?

I bet a convincing argument could be built for either point of view

Turbo · Post by **Turbo** » Wed Jun 21, 2006 4:45 am

There was a 251 called last night at about 6:30pm. Train v Pedestrian - not pretty.

Post by **Zebedee** » Wed Jun 21, 2006 2:40 pm

Turbo wrote:There was a 251 called last night at about 6:30pm. Train v Pedestrian - not pretty.

The train almost always wins ...