Page 1 of 2
Leederville Incident 05/10/2010
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:10 pm
by written_ficton
Most of us know what happened here. I didn't get any pictures of the 'incident' but here are a few shots that may be of interest.
DM Metro blocking off a lane of traffic on the Mitchell Freeway
Both Heavy Rescue's present, Perth 3rd and Daglish 2nd. [Nicely parked!]
UQ units behind.

Re: Leederville Incident 05/10/2010
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:31 pm
by gkoutlis
Tragic outcome.... Very sad indeed....
But great snaps of the emergency vehicles in attendance WF...
G
Re: Leederville Incident 05/10/2010
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:38 pm
by HL 101
That Police Officer with flip flops on ? thought they needed inclosed shoes

Re: Leederville Incident 05/10/2010
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 7:54 am
by written_ficton
HL 101 wrote:That Police Officer with flip flops on ? thought they needed inclosed shoes

I do not think he was a serving officer. I believe he was a party of occupants of the train and was handed a high visability vest because of his location.
Re: Leederville Incident 05/10/2010
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 10:20 am
by WPXZBP
DM Metro is labelled as DM Perth.
Re: Leederville Incident 05/10/2010
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 1:41 pm
by HL 101
Thanks W_F for clearing that up

Re: Leederville Incident 05/10/2010
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 1:52 pm
by hold3n
Great shots W_F but on the other hand a sad day for the deceased family
what police and fire units were all their may i ask.
Re: Leederville Incident 05/10/2010
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 2:14 pm
by HL 101
Fire & Rescue
Perth 3rd MPHR
Daglish 2nd MPHR
Unsure for WAPOL
Re: Leederville Incident 05/10/2010
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 11:36 pm
by Tyranus
Good shots, Daglish 2nd was back on station by 1800 though as I went past the station around then and it was there. A day that I was glad I was on a bike, sad work for FRS, Police, Ambulance, Train Driver and passengers. It's never worth trying to cross the tracks to catch the train, it may well just catch you.
Re: Leederville Incident 05/10/2010
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 5:43 am
by VK6LD
HL 101 wrote:HL 101 wrote:
That Police Officer with flip flops on ? thought they needed inclosed shoes
I do not think he was a serving officer. I believe he was a party of occupants of the train and was handed a high visability vest because of his location.
.
Re: Leederville Incident 05/10/2010
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 9:29 am
by Fastlane
VK6LD wrote:HL 101 wrote:HL 101 wrote:
That Police Officer with flip flops on ? thought they needed inclosed shoes
I do not think he was a serving officer. I believe he was a party of occupants of the train and was handed a high visability vest because of his location.
Could be off duty, on the way home...?
Sounds more likely. Any 'member of the public' would've been well and truly moved on...
Re: Leederville Incident 05/10/2010
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 9:47 am
by written_ficton
Not correct, unless they were giving statements or a member of the deceased. There were officers talking to him with note books in hand so I am standing by statement from what I saw.
Re: Leederville Incident 05/10/2010
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 2:44 pm
by VK6LD
written_ficton wrote:Not correct, unless they were giving statements or a member of the deceased. There were officers talking to him with note books in hand so I am standing by statement from what I saw.
You may need to take a seat.

Re: Leederville Incident 05/10/2010
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:29 pm
by written_ficton
I'd be glad to take a seat. Only can report on what I have seen..
Re: Leederville Incident 05/10/2010
Posted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 6:57 pm
by Tyranus
Maybe an off duty officer that was on the train? I expect if he was just a witness he'd have had the vest inside out and not been hanging around the side of a pump.