Vehicle callsign spreadsheet

ZO100_marto · Post by **ZO100_marto** » Mon May 22, 2006 9:13 am

HM 616 seen today on Morley Dr, commadore standard livery with GDLB.

marto

Tom · Post by **Tom** » Mon May 22, 2006 1:28 pm

Tom wrote:
CC, was GC105 a normal sedan or did it have a pod? I heard that car for the first time the other night. I'll have to chase that one up for some pics.

rgds

Tom

Tom,

Was definately a Sedan with GDLB. Front tyres were well baked with Brake Dust...

Cheers, CC

CC, you 100% sure it wasn't GC106 you saw??

Me and Damo have checked out the front of Curtin multiple times on Sat, Sun and today and haven't seen it, just the usual crap GC101/103/106/107/111/112/119 and 121.

Saying that I haven't seen GC104 either which is a new car also, so either it's parked out the back or it's been bingled already.

GC106 is a wreck and the wheels are pitch black front AND rear!!

If anyone sees GC104 or GC105-? can they let us know.

cheers

Tom

ConstableCare · Post by **ConstableCare** » Tue May 23, 2006 7:38 am

Tom wrote:
Tom wrote:
CC, was GC105 a normal sedan or did it have a pod? I heard that car for the first time the other night. I'll have to chase that one up for some pics.

rgds

Tom

Tom,

Was definately a Sedan with GDLB. Front tyres were well baked with Brake Dust...

Cheers, CC
CC, you 100% sure it wasn't GC106 you saw??

Me and Damo have checked out the front of Curtin multiple times on Sat, Sun and today and haven't seen it, just the usual crap GC101/103/106/107/111/112/119 and 121.

Saying that I haven't seen GC104 either which is a new car also, so either it's parked out the back or it's been bingled already.

GC106 is a wreck and the wheels are pitch black front AND rear!!

If anyone sees GC104 or GC105-? can they let us know.

cheers

Tom

Tom,

Definately GC105!

Cheers, Duncan.

ConstableCare · Post by **ConstableCare** » Tue May 23, 2006 7:40 am

Update for Listing:

AV252 - VZ S/Wagon - VLB - Spotties - Crash Markings (High Viz Red Striping)

Seen at 0720hrs this morning under P2 to T/A on Mundijong Road....

Cheers, CC

pinkbosseslady · Post by **pinkbosseslady** » Tue May 23, 2006 7:35 pm

Post by **gkoutlis** » Wed May 24, 2006 9:01 am

Guys who is - XH-326 - I heard him book on as a non-tasking vehicle - on Channel 8

pinkbosseslady · Post by **pinkbosseslady** » Wed May 24, 2006 5:06 pm

ConstableCare · Post by **ConstableCare** » Fri May 26, 2006 7:26 am

pinkbosseslady wrote:
ConstableCare wrote: TE504 - BA Ute with Canopy - GDLB - Std. WAPOL Markings
TE504 is a BF Ute

Thanks PBL. Never did like Fords

ConstableCare · Post by **ConstableCare** » Fri May 26, 2006 7:28 am

For the spreadsheet:

VR101/103, VK104 - All GDLB's

Cheers, CC

Millsy · Post by **Millsy** » Fri May 26, 2006 7:42 am

ConstableCare wrote:For the spreadsheet:

VR101/103, VK104 - All GDLB's

Cheers, CC

There isn't a VK104 mate, they have a 101, 102 and 103.
VR104 , BA falcon ute. with GDLB

Tom · Post by **Tom** » Fri May 26, 2006 10:10 am

ConstableCare wrote:
For the spreadsheet:

VR101/103, VK104 - All GDLB's

Cheers, CC

There isn't a VK104 mate, they have a 101, 102 and 103.
VR104 , BA falcon ute. with GDLB

Don't worry Millsy their ISN'T a GC105 either, call-sign exsists and that's about it.....

Phantom cars.......

cheers

Tom

ConstableCare · Post by **ConstableCare** » Fri May 26, 2006 11:25 am

Tom wrote:
ConstableCare wrote:
For the spreadsheet:

VR101/103, VK104 - All GDLB's

Cheers, CC

There isn't a VK104 mate, they have a 101, 102 and 103.
VR104 , BA falcon ute. with GDLB

Don't worry Millsy their ISN'T a GC105 either, call-sign exsists and that's about it.....

Phantom cars.......

cheers

Tom

If you gunna be like that I won't bother putting any more on here!

Tom · Post by **Tom** » Fri May 26, 2006 1:13 pm

CC,

you don't have to get shitty about it.

It's nothing personal mate, but this is the third time.

TE207 is still the .05 VZ Commodore not a Highway Patrol SV6

GC105 exsists as a call-sign only but no actual current vehicle, unless you've seen a new car somewhere, but I'm 99% sure you said you saw it outside Curtin House (maybe JC105-?)

And VK104 which Millsy assures us doens't exist...

I'm not here to upset people, start a flamming war and make enemies...Just sharing a common interest.

cheers

Tom

ConstableCare · Post by **ConstableCare** » Fri May 26, 2006 2:22 pm

Tom wrote:CC,

you don't have to get shitty about it.

It's nothing personal mate, but this is the third time.

TE207 is still the .05 VZ Commodore not a Highway Patrol SV6

GC105 exsists as a call-sign only but no actual current vehicle, unless you've seen a new car somewhere, but I'm 99% sure you said you saw it outside Curtin House (maybe JC105-?)

And VK104 which Millsy assures us doens't exist...

I'm not here to upset people, start a flamming war and make enemies...Just sharing a common interest.

cheers

Tom

As stated previously, I did see GC105 on Aberdeen Street heading towards Curtin House. Guess no-one has thought that the vehicle in question may be 'on loan' to another district, hence the reason it has not been sighted as yet? Thought not...

Oh, and I suppose Millsy must be an expert as he has allegedly proven me wrong over VK104...

As for TE-207, well, it was pulling away from me at High Speed and I believed what I saw was TE207

Anyway, who am I to say anything. Quite obviously there are more qualified people out there able to provide credible info, so I won't bother posting anything worthwhile on here anymore - just sit in the darkness and let all the "experts" contribute...

I am sure other 'people' on here have also been wrong - TF102 comes to mind all of a sudden... anyway

Your loss

Post by **gkoutlis** » Fri May 26, 2006 2:46 pm

ConstableCare wrote:
Tom wrote:CC,

you don't have to get shitty about it.

It's nothing personal mate, but this is the third time.

TE207 is still the .05 VZ Commodore not a Highway Patrol SV6

GC105 exsists as a call-sign only but no actual current vehicle, unless you've seen a new car somewhere, but I'm 99% sure you said you saw it outside Curtin House (maybe JC105-?)

And VK104 which Millsy assures us doens't exist...

I'm not here to upset people, start a flamming war and make enemies...Just sharing a common interest.

cheers

Tom
As stated previously, I did see GC105 on Aberdeen Street heading towards Curtin House. Guess no-one has thought that the vehicle in question may be 'on loan' to another district, hence the reason it has not been sighted as yet? Thought not...

Oh, and I suppose Millsy must be an expert as he has allegedly proven me wrong over VK104...

As for TE-207, well, it was pulling away from me at High Speed and I believed what I saw was TE207

Anyway, who am I to say anything. Quite obviously there are more qualified people out there able to provide credible info, so I won't bother posting anything worthwhile on here anymore - just sit in the darkness and let all the "experts" contribute...

I am sure other 'people' on here have also been wrong - TF102 comes to mind all of a sudden... anyway

Your loss

CC - No mate - please don't be like that - Look if its any consellation - I have a photo of TE-207 - and also have seen GC-105 Is a fully marked Holden VZ Patrol Car....so it was a one off sighting in Forrest Chase.... CC please come back mate your contribution to the forum is appreciated by all including myself.