Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 12:32 am
... my mistake was polair 61
WA Radio Scanner Users' Group
Providing a voice for responsible scanner users in Western Australia
https://warsug.info/
RESCUE 651/652 Observations
Page 11 of 28
.
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 5:20 pm
.
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:08 pm
also flew over subiaco oval this afternoon in a northerly direction. Sorry jj dont know what time, was busy watching the football
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 9:23 am
Where abouts were you Bomber?bomber wrote:also flew over subiaco oval this afternoon in a northerly direction. Sorry jj dont know what time, was busy watching the football
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 10:47 am
Bay 107. lower levelgkoutlis wrote:Where abouts were you Bomber?bomber wrote:also flew over subiaco oval this afternoon in a northerly direction. Sorry jj dont know what time, was busy watching the football
yourself ?.
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 11:59 am
I was a first aider there - so covered Block 134-135 first then swapped to Gate 19 - next to the Pizza guy...bomber wrote:Bay 107. lower levelgkoutlis wrote:Where abouts were you Bomber?bomber wrote:also flew over subiaco oval this afternoon in a northerly direction. Sorry jj dont know what time, was busy watching the football
yourself ?.
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:52 pm
Rescue 65, P2 from peel health campus to RPH.
Also heard on FRS, timing appears to be correct.
Also heard on FRS, timing appears to be correct.
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:58 pm
since when can rescue 65 go p2 does it have lights and sirens up top???
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:36 pm
Only if you enjoy a bit of the green stuff.
For the rest of us, Rescue 65 operates under a priority system on the RFDS flight tracking site.
For the rest of us, Rescue 65 operates under a priority system on the RFDS flight tracking site.
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 8:56 pm
...
.
Posted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 9:14 pm
.
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 12:19 am
just a quick question, jason maybe you can answer.
i have noticed a few times that you have said 65 is at a certain altitude, is this a clearance to that altitude and below for that area, or the specific altitude its at?
reason i ask is more often then not i see it fly over my at between 500ft and 100ft, and also 2000ft from charlie gardiner to jandakot seems a bit unnecessary. i have a little bit of aviation knowledge, just need this cleared up, cheers in advance
i have noticed a few times that you have said 65 is at a certain altitude, is this a clearance to that altitude and below for that area, or the specific altitude its at?
reason i ask is more often then not i see it fly over my at between 500ft and 100ft, and also 2000ft from charlie gardiner to jandakot seems a bit unnecessary. i have a little bit of aviation knowledge, just need this cleared up, cheers in advance
.
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 9:44 am
.
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 2:08 pm
thanks heaps mate. makes a bit more sence.
.
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:50 am
.