Page 2 of 2

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 9:03 am
by Kinetic
Michael Keeping wrote:Hi group,

Who is at fault here? (Group Question)

Similar to the way the police are not supposed to pursue vehicles at high speed anymore.
That way both the suspect and other road users are safe.

Could a similar tactic have been applied here? (Group Question)

Regards,
Michael Keeping
A) The person who drowned

B) They abort pursuits mainly because it is dangerous to bystanders. In a foot chase the POI can run into another peron as fast as he can, and maybe knock them over at worst. In a car chase the POI could easily kill a family of 4.

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 4:15 pm
by Markmywords
Well he wont be doing that again.

Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 4:27 pm
by Kinetic
Markmywords wrote:Well he wont be doing that again.
Well... That depends

Can zombies drown?

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 3:51 am
by radiohead
Markmywords wrote:Well he wont be doing that again.

:smt079

Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 9:11 pm
by Lucas_arts_182
the POI obvisously thought it was worth the risk , you cant blame the cops , he jumped they didnt push him ,and in my mind , its just one less scumbag that would have broken into your house , or robbed an old lady