Page 2 of 4
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 2:53 pm
by Cloverfield
...
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 5:00 pm
by nachoman
A similar setup is planned for Welshpool Rd, they may already be in place I don't know.
Sensor loops are in the yellow crossing mark sections of the road. The camera takes high def photos and video of cars when the booms are activated. These are automatically sent off to wherever. The PTA Control room can also get a live feed of the crossing via the second camera.
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 5:06 pm
by Cloverfield
cheers...
Had a feeling that may be the case...
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 6:17 pm
by vk6hgr
Awk@night wrote:I can confirm that I was informed today that they are in fact PTA owned and are being triled...
Ahem.
trialed
Does the PTA have the authority to fine people under the RTC for avoiding boom gates? Or do they have to take the footage to the police who use it as evidence to fine drivers...?
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 6:19 pm
by vk6hgr
Awk@night wrote: I am sure they are red light camers, that don't use the conventional weight senors at the crossing.
I thought red light cameras used induction loops?
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:39 pm
by Cloverfield
...
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 4:54 pm
by auntys_eyes
I think it would be fair to say that all in ground triggers for electronic equipment (eg cameras, gates) are induction loops (wires placed in a loop under the surface), as any sort of 'weight' sensors would rely on complex mechanical devices, prone to damage and malfunction. An induction loop is simply triggered by a metal object passing over it, and is easily installed by cutting the surface, placing the wire in the cut and sealing the cut. This is what you see in the bitumen at intersections controlled by TCLs and at electronic gates. Any sort of weight trigger would involve some sort of excavation and surface replacement.
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 5:42 pm
by Tyranus
auntys_eyes wrote:I think it would be fair to say that all in ground triggers for electronic equipment (eg cameras, gates) are induction loops (wires placed in a loop under the surface), as any sort of 'weight' sensors would rely on complex mechanical devices, prone to damage and malfunction. An induction loop is simply triggered by a metal object passing over it, and is easily installed by cutting the surface, placing the wire in the cut and sealing the cut. This is what you see in the bitumen at intersections controlled by TCLs and at electronic gates. Any sort of weight trigger would involve some sort of excavation and surface replacement.
That does sound more feasible, I must admit that that's the way I'd always been told it worked, and thats the way I figured it would work, makes sense. A metal push bike can trigger TCL's while a carbon fibre one won't, weight might be the issue, but I think the road would have to move a fair bit to detect the weight of vehicles etc.
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 5:44 pm
by jmmw
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:05 pm
by dazla
Gav,
You might find that becauase the offence takes place on PTA Property that they can prosecute for the offence. There is an offence under the Public Transport Authority Regulations for not obeying a signal or sign.
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:48 pm
by Cloverfield
...
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:01 pm
by dazla
I fined a couple of people for driving around the boom gates when I was a Transit, only when I witnessed it myself.
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:16 pm
by Chicky
dazla wrote:I fined a couple of people for driving around the boom gates when I was a Transit, only when I witnessed it myself.
Just out of curiosity, daz, what's the fine worth?
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 9:14 am
by celestial_insight
Chicky wrote:dazla wrote:I fined a couple of people for driving around the boom gates when I was a Transit, only when I witnessed it myself.
Just out of curiosity, daz, what's the fine worth?
4 demerits and $200 infringement
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 11:10 am
by Chicky
Cheers, CI. Expensive risk!