Deteriorated Signal Quality?

WA Department of Fire and Emergency Services (6AR and 6IP) (Including the Fire Services, SES & VMRS) and Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions

Moderator: bogged

Post Reply
Clontarf[X]
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 1:31 am
Location: UHF 16

Deteriorated Signal Quality?

Post by Clontarf[X] »

Hi Guys,

Quick question, wondering if anyone was having reception issues on 164.000 and surrounding freqs? I haven't listened to the scanner in a while, but it seems that the quality has gone really bad. The strength seems fine, as the scanner has no issues locking onto the frequency, it's just almost entirely static and I'm barely able to make out any voice.

Any ideas? Issue is the same between the standard rubber arial and a 1m pole type arial.

I'm on the Scarborough/Karrinyup border if that helps.

Ta.
yorky
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2641
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 7:46 pm
Location: Perth

Re: Deteriorated Signal Quality?

Post by yorky »

Is 164.2750 any good for you?

EDIT: Actually maybe 163.250
Last edited by yorky on Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"VKI, NJ050 will you be attending the job?"
"Negative VKI, my desk is bolted to the floor".
WARSUG General Scanning Moderator
Clontarf[X]
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 1:31 am
Location: UHF 16

Re: Deteriorated Signal Quality?

Post by Clontarf[X] »

Getting absolutely nothing on that freq.
Clontarf[X]
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 1:31 am
Location: UHF 16

Re: Deteriorated Signal Quality?

Post by Clontarf[X] »

Sorry I take that back, I'm getting stuff through now, it's a bit clearer (i.e understandable) but still a heap of noise/static. So upset :(
yorky
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2641
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 7:46 pm
Location: Perth

Re: Deteriorated Signal Quality?

Post by yorky »

164.000 is coming through fine for me.
"VKI, NJ050 will you be attending the job?"
"Negative VKI, my desk is bolted to the floor".
WARSUG General Scanning Moderator
Clontarf[X]
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 1:31 am
Location: UHF 16

Re: Deteriorated Signal Quality?

Post by Clontarf[X] »

Hmm strange. Might try walking around with it in a bit and see if it's just it's position. Cheers yorky.
yorky
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2641
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 7:46 pm
Location: Perth

Re: Deteriorated Signal Quality?

Post by yorky »

Can you use 78.050 or 78.100 or 78.125 in the meantime? If you are stationary with an outdoor antenna it may even be better.
"VKI, NJ050 will you be attending the job?"
"Negative VKI, my desk is bolted to the floor".
WARSUG General Scanning Moderator
vk6hgr
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2614
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 10:33 pm
Amateur callsign: VK6HGR
Scanners and Receivers: Various Yaesu, Kenwood, Tait, Simoco and Philips'
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Contact:

Re: Deteriorated Signal Quality?

Post by vk6hgr »

The 163.250MHz Red Hill repeater which the stream uses seems to be still coming in okay with just a whip antenna on the back porch :)
Gavin Rogers; VK6HGR
http://vk6hgr.ampr.org/
WARSUG forum administrator
Site and stream donations: https://www.paypal.me/vk6hgr
Clontarf[X]
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 1:31 am
Location: UHF 16

Re: Deteriorated Signal Quality?

Post by Clontarf[X] »

Yeah I'm definitely blaming my gear. I'm not getting anywhere near the reception I was getting before anywhere inside here. Ahh well. Thanks guys.
Post Reply