Morse no longer required?

Amateur Radio discussion

Moderator: VK6ZMS

robbage
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2993
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 10:06 am
Amateur callsign: VK6UFO_VK6RN
Scanners and Receivers:  
Scanners/receivers
Diamond Welz WS1000 wideband handheld
Radioshack Pro 28 handheld
Uniden UBC72XLT handheld
Uniden UBC73XLT handheld
Uniden UBC330CRS desktop

Two-way
Yaesu VX-3R 2m/70cm Ham TRX and wideband RX handheld
Yaesu FT-1802M 2m Ham TRX mobile x 2
Yaesu FT-7800R 2m/70cm Ham TRX and wide band RX mobile
Icom IC-208H 2m/70cm Ham TRX and wide band RX mobile
Icom IC-706MKIIG all-band all-mode Ham TRX mobile
Icom IC-V85 2m VHF Ham TRX handheld
Wouxun KG-UVD1P VHF/UHF wideband Ham TRX handheld
Wouxun KG-679P VHF wideband Ham TRX handheld
Wouxun KG-713 UHF wideband Ham TRX handheld
Location: Just on the border of your waking mind

Post by robbage »

vk6hgr wrote:It should always have been optional. IMHO, Morse was used as nothing more than an artificial entry barrier to prevent certain people from entering the "good old boys" hobby. Fortunately, that attitude is long gone.
That's pretty much what I thought, although I'm not sure the 'Good Old Boys' attitude is completely gone. I was reading a pro-ESSB guy's rant a few days ago online and the GOB's resistance to it's acceptance.

My father and I learnt morse out of class from an old timer who lived down the road. He was a signal operator in the German army during WWII. Of a class of a dozen or so, we were the only ones to get our NAOCP. The rest failed the morse :? (It's also how we found out what ———— is)
Rob
OF78WD
 Amateur moderator
.
Arguing with a fool proves there are two
Post Reply