Page 1 of 1

ACMA article

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:52 am
by Zebedee
The following article appeared on the ACMA website yesterday. It's an important reminder that we're all bound by the conditions of our licence and also by the various radiocommunications acts and regulations. Of course here in WA, we don't seem to have too much of this kind of problem ... (touch wood)
Amateurs need to play by the rules
On 16 January 2012

Amateur radio operators have been put on notice by the ACMA that they need to abide by the law following the successful prosecution of an operator from Melbourne’s western suburbs.

The 63-year-old man pleaded guilty in the Werribee Magistrates Court on 11 January 2012 to several offences after an extensive investigation into alleged breaches of the Radiocommunications Act 1992.

The offences—unlicensed operation of a radiocommunications device, unlawful possession of a radiocommunications device and causing interference to radiocommunications—carry penalties of up to two years’ imprisonment.

The court was told that, until August 2009, the defendant had been a licensed amateur radio operator but was investigated by the ACMA following extensive complaints about interference. As a result of the investigation, the ACMA cancelled the defendant’s amateur licence. He then continued to use his amateur radio regularly from his home, contrary to the Radiocommunications Act, jamming other licensed amateur users.

After further complaints, the ACMA traced the interfering signal back to the defendant’s home a number of times. However, despite warnings from the ACMA, the complaints continued. The execution of the search warrant by the ACMA in September 2011 confirmed that the defendant had a large amount of radiocommunications equipment, contrary to the Act. Tests confirmed that the equipment was set to the radio frequencies that had been interfered with.

The court placed the defendant on a 12-month good behaviour bond, ordered him to dispose of all of the seized equipment within four months and prove to the ACMA in writing that he had disposed of the equipment.

The ACMA reminds amateur operators that interference to amateur radio frequencies, particularly by the jamming of signals, can have a serious impact on safety, particularly in emergencies. All amateur licensees should be aware of and must operate their station in accordance with the Act and the licence conditions relating to the type of licence held.

Re: ACMA article

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:12 pm
by vk6hgr
To be fair, it sounds like the guy was a radio troublemaker and the fact that he once held an amateur radio license has very little to do with it.

Re: ACMA article

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:11 pm
by Fitzyyy
vk6hgr wrote:To be fair, it sounds like the guy was a radio troublemaker and the fact that he once held an amateur radio license has very little to do with it.
I would never of guessed that he was a 63 year old, a bit odd to see someone of that maturity to be committing such crimes

Re: ACMA article

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 5:26 pm
by VK6ZMS
A couple of ACMA vans with antennas on them have been spotted around Perth last week.

Re: ACMA article

Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 6:31 pm
by Zebedee
vk6hgr wrote:To be fair, it sounds like the guy was a radio troublemaker and the fact that he once held an amateur radio license has very little to do with it.
Yep, from the article it seemed like the guy was a complete wombat and ended up having his licence cancelled due to his behaviour. That wasn't enough of a clue and he kept up with his antics (no doubt fuelled with a good dose of resentment due to having his licence taken off him) and eventually it all caught up with him.

It's a bit rich though for the article to call him an "amateur" since he's had his licence cancelled.

Re: ACMA article

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 6:02 am
by robbage
According to dictionary.com, one of the definitions of 'amateur' is:

3. a person inexperienced or unskilled in a particular activity:

So technically they can call him that :-)

Re: ACMA article

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 9:45 am
by Fitzyyy
robbage wrote:According to dictionary.com, one of the definitions of 'amateur' is:

3. a person inexperienced or unskilled in a particular activity:

So technically they can call him that :-)
Makes perfect sense :lol:

Re: ACMA article

Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:20 pm
by VK6ZMS
They are back in the west, a few people have had a visit.