Multiple Scanners sharing 1 antenna

General questions on scanning from 30 to 3000Mhz. Not sure what you can receive in your area? Here's the place to ask!

Moderator: yorky

Post Reply
numloxx
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 3:39 pm
Amateur callsign: VK6PCB
Location: Maylands, Perth, WA
Contact:

Multiple Scanners sharing 1 antenna

Post by numloxx »

Hi all,

I want to add 2 or 3 more scanners to my LiveATC feed.

Currently I have an old Uniden 3000XLT (From memory), connected to a raspberry pi. Antenna is along a RG58 (or 59) coaxial cable about 15-20 m in length to my friend's apartment balcony which has line of sight to the airport tower and some of the field.

What kind of rf performance loss will I get if I had 2 or 3 extra scanners to that cable, so that I can provide feeds for 3 or 4 different channels separately?
Is it better to have a max of 2 scanners per antenna? Upgrade cable to RG6 or RG216 or something heavier?

The plan is to have a separate feed for MEL CTR, APP, TOWER/GRND and Departures (or Delivery) instead of scanning all the time between them all.
yorky
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2630
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 7:46 pm
Location: Perth

Re: Multiple Scanners sharing 1 antenna

Post by yorky »

I run two off one without much drama, but I'm sure others can chime in with actual losses.

Shouldn't hurt to just give it a shot, I know you can run several TV's off one antenna also without a lot of drama if you have good reception. So if it is line of sight to the transmitter it should be fine.
"VKI, NJ050 will you be attending the job?"
"Negative VKI, my desk is bolted to the floor".
WARSUG General Scanning Moderator
Bonez
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 807
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 5:37 pm
Location: Perth, WA

Re: Multiple Scanners sharing 1 antenna

Post by Bonez »

It should be fine to add more receivers, but if it were me I would think about upgrading that RG58 to RG213 if you have the opportunity to do so.
You'll naturally get a bit of loss through the additional connectors and patch cables needed to connect those additional receivers, so with better quality coax you'll eliminate some of the losses incurred with that.

In saying all of the above, if you have line of sight to the airport in that particular location, it probably won't make a huge amount of difference if you are only trying to receive air traffic anyway.
numloxx
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 3:39 pm
Amateur callsign: VK6PCB
Location: Maylands, Perth, WA
Contact:

Re: Multiple Scanners sharing 1 antenna

Post by numloxx »

Hi Bonez,

Yeah I intend to upgrade the cable to RG213 soon, due to the extra signal required to split it 3 ways initially, and later on 4 ways.

Thanks for your advice.
vk6hgr
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2610
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 10:33 pm
Amateur callsign: VK6HGR
Scanners and Receivers: Various Yaesu, Kenwood, Tait, Simoco and Philips'
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Contact:

Re: Multiple Scanners sharing 1 antenna

Post by vk6hgr »

I'd use TV RG6 and a TV-type splitter for your scanners. Crimp and F-type adapters are available to go to PL-259 and BNC. The impedance mismatch loss loss of RG6 over that length of a run will be less than the loss of using 50ohm cable, and splitters are far cheaper.
Gavin Rogers; VK6HGR
http://vk6hgr.ampr.org/
WARSUG forum administrator
Site and stream donations: https://www.paypal.me/vk6hgr
numloxx
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 3:39 pm
Amateur callsign: VK6PCB
Location: Maylands, Perth, WA
Contact:

Re: Multiple Scanners sharing 1 antenna

Post by numloxx »

Hi Gav,

I got a friend of mine to get me some LMR400 cheap, 25m length. At the end I've 3 x t pieces.
Reception with 3 receivers is nearly better than before with the RG58.
interference
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:29 am

Re: Multiple Scanners sharing 1 antenna

Post by interference »

I use RTL-SDRs to receive and share ADSB data. I have just ordered a TV antenna amplifier splitter as I have 4 RTL SDR dongles running from one antenna and I think they would be better served with a proper splitter / amp. I will advise of results. Anyone else tried it?
Post Reply