WA Radio Scanner Users' Group

Providing a voice for responsible scanner users in Western Australia
It is currently Tue Feb 28, 2017 11:06 am

All times are UTC + 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 9:08 am 
Offline
150+ posts
150+ posts

Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 12:00 pm
Posts: 158
Location: Northern Territory
Thought some people might find this interesting

http://www.ntnews.com.au/article/2010/1 ... tnews.html

Do you support the action taken?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 9:59 am 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 7:46 am
Posts: 5241
SJANT wrote:
Thought some people might find this interesting

http://www.ntnews.com.au/article/2010/1 ... tnews.html

Do you support the action taken?


Hmmm - well, it's a tough call really isn't it - 90km/hr over the speed limit, is excessive. I don't know what the roads are like in the NT - but if there was no traffic, going over by 30-40kms over the limit would be okay IF they took extreme care at intersections/stop signs etc...

Put that situation in Perth, and you'd have problems.... we are far too populated, and to do 90kms over the limit, and a serious crash will almost definitely happen.

The speed restriction (20kms over limit only) I think is a fair restriction to keep the Paramedics/Ambulance Officers and the public - Safe.

Yes it was a critical job - Cardiac Arrest... Time IS critical, but - I don't think driving 90kms over is justified...

My 2 cents.

G

_________________
George
WARSUG Moderator
VFRS Member

"I am not one who was born in the possession of knowledge. I am one who is fond of antiquity, and earnest in seeking it there." — Confucius

Image

Any views expressed in the above post are my own and do not necessarily depict or reflect the views or opinions of DFES/FRS or VBFB.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:07 am 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:15 am
Posts: 1666
Location: Greenmount
I believe you have misread the article Mr G. The story implies he was doing 90km/h, not 90 over. I assume the the speed limit may have been 50 or 60km/h and therefore he was travelling 30-40 over the limit, and susequently only 10-20km/h beyond the SJA policy.

_________________
WARSUG Moderator - Media Section

VBFB Member

No onion, no garlic, no chilli, no pepper... NO POINT!!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:10 am 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 7:46 am
Posts: 5241
auntys_eyes wrote:
I believe you have misread the article Mr G. The story says he was doing 90km/h, not 90 over. I assume the the speed limit may have been 50 or 60km/h and therefore he was travelling 30-40 over the limit, and susequently only 10-20km/h beyond the SJA policy.


I stand corrected thanks AE. I just re-read this -
Quote:
doing more than 90km/h
but what they didn't say was what the posted speed limit was. So I retract my above comments of speeding more than 90kms to the posted limit.

G

_________________
George
WARSUG Moderator
VFRS Member

"I am not one who was born in the possession of knowledge. I am one who is fond of antiquity, and earnest in seeking it there." — Confucius

Image

Any views expressed in the above post are my own and do not necessarily depict or reflect the views or opinions of DFES/FRS or VBFB.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:20 am 
Offline
150+ posts
150+ posts

Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:14 am
Posts: 180
I think the key to this is not the speed he was doing, but the fact that he went against ambulance policy. From what I can gather he didn't break the road rules, and as such he hasn't been charged or fined. However SJ most likely have a policy which limits the speed they can do above a posted limit. To use a number they may only be allowed to do 20km/h aboouve the limit when responding under emergency calls. So if the posted speed limit is 50 km/h then the ambulance can only do 70 km/h. Perhaps SJANT can help out with the policy this person went against.

If the above is true, then the action is appropriate (the time may be excessive, but I am not going to debate that). Rules and policies are there for everyones safety, that is the employees and the public. If the driver went against the policy and caused an accident, he is leaving himself open. The consequences of going against a policy and something goes wrong can be life changing for the employee, and not in a good way.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 4:57 pm 
Offline
150+ posts
150+ posts

Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 12:00 pm
Posts: 158
Location: Northern Territory
That particular section of road is 70km/hr and it is indicated by the article the person in question was driving over 90km/hr so faster than the 20km/hr over the posted speed limit which is against policy according to management as quoted by the article. All the comments in the NT news indicate great public support for the paramedics themselves and not the management. Only 3 negative comments out of 100 which support the great work paramedics do but condem the management for holding them back.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group