Page 22 of 43

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 11:33 am
by musketeer
Scism crying doesn't help, it's actually looked upon as a weakness

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2008 1:20 pm
by Schism_
Just following suite.

Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 6:41 pm
by Markmywords
Poor SJA crew that got called out to check a ladys "blood pressure"..i wonder if she used "chest pain" in her call...to get an ambulance.

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 11:46 am
by Markmywords
Mustve been busy this morning, had a car v wall out the front off mine about 1:30am (notorious bad intersection) only minor injuries, was slightly insulted when even before giving a hand over the attending officer goes "you dont work for alas do ya"....

:lol:

and had to laugh at the towie who was trying to convince the owner to get his vehicle towed home before the police arrived to save a d/d charge.

Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:36 pm
by Toottoot

SJA Info

Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:53 pm
by jasonjag
Thankyou, I found that all very interesting.

Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:48 pm
by eswife
Shame they couldn't put a picture of a WA ambulance, how hard would that of been for them...??? :roll:

Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:55 pm
by Tyranus
eswife wrote:Shame they couldn't put a picture of a WA ambulance, how hard would that of been for them...??? :roll:
A bit like the IGA poster's saying we support your local community with the pictures of the melbourne FF...then again IGA have been fundraising just recently for the BFS, so credit to them.

Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 11:17 pm
by WPXZBP
This is a copy of the email I sent to ABC.
I thought I'd write to enquire as to why a "WA local" page about a person working for St John Ambulance (SJA) features an ambulance not from SJA? From the looks of it the ambulance featured seems to be from another state altogether.

Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 6:23 am
by eswife
They also got one of the surnames wrong too.....

Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 4:13 pm
by WPXZBP
At least an SJA ambo pic is up now.

Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 4:32 pm
by Toottoot
Haha good work. I expect that they were afraid of being exposed on MediaWatch.

Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:53 pm
by WPXZBP
I'd have nominated them. :P

Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:28 pm
by PFO
anyone see the writeup on SJA in the paper the other day. From what ive been told their investigating 2 particular jobs in which were attended as a P1
and transferred on a one but the patients in question werent deemed as p1 patients. SJA being accused of revenue raising? Did anyone read this and confirm? Apparently the complaints are being made by the paramedics themselves. If this is true then good on them for doing so.

Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2008 10:16 pm
by munchkin1981
PFO wrote:anyone see the writeup on SJA in the paper the other day. From what ive been told their investigating 2 particular jobs in which were attended as a P1
and transferred on a one but the patients in question werent deemed as p1 patients. SJA being accused of revenue raising? Did anyone read this and confirm? Apparently the complaints are being made by the paramedics themselves. If this is true then good on them for doing so.
its the paramedicas who make the call to transfer on a 1 if they didnt think pt needed to they dont have to