General fire discussions

WA Department of Fire and Emergency Services (6AR and 6IP) (Including the Fire Services, SES & VMRS) and Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions

Moderator: bogged

written_ficton
WARSUG top poster
WARSUG top poster
Posts: 2716
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:08 pm

Re: Significant bush fires 2011/12

Post by written_ficton »

@ Philby,

CFA had 30yr old tankers heading out to fires, most probably still do around that age. Its still an appliance, still does the job, has the gear and more importantly has got the experiance of crew to take it on. Just have to say good on them! Perhaps FESA may give them a better appliance.
kyeboi
150+ posts
150+ posts
Posts: 340
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:55 pm
Scanners and Receivers: UNIDEN UBC355XLT

Re: Significant bush fires 2011/12

Post by kyeboi »

st johns required for fire in bindoon maybe just in case someone gets hurt ?
Fire Chief
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:20 am

Re: Significant bush fires 2011/12

Post by Fire Chief »

Under the new Emergency Managagment laws if a Fire last 4 hours or more St Johns gets called in.It will be Vollies.

I spent 4 days at the Two Rocks/Yanchup fire on Ambo duty in the 1990's
observer
150+ posts
150+ posts
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:14 am

Re: Significant bush fires 2011/12

Post by observer »

written_ficton wrote:@ Philby,

CFA had 30yr old tankers heading out to fires, most probably still do around that age. Its still an appliance, still does the job, has the gear and more importantly has got the experiance of crew to take it on. Just have to say good on them! Perhaps FESA may give them a better appliance.
If this occurs, this would be the excemption rather than the norm. Form what I know the CFA have very little, if any 30 yr old tankers. They generally run on a 15 year turn around, but this has been stretched to 20 years. I don't know of any front line tanker in the CRA that is 30 yeras, however there may be one or 2.
written_ficton
WARSUG top poster
WARSUG top poster
Posts: 2716
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:08 pm

Re: General fire discussions

Post by written_ficton »

Up until recently there has been quite a few, which are being replaced at quite a good place. You just have to look at what is currently on the market for sale. i.e 1984 Ford Trader which had been retired late last year. 2011 - 1984 = 27years. Granted not exactly 30yrs but close...
observer
150+ posts
150+ posts
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:14 am

Re: General fire discussions

Post by observer »

Ford Trader were used as light pumpers (refered to as Type 2 pumpers), similiar to the Mazda in WA. As I said there are some exemptions and this is one. There were a couple of these still in use in small country towns. In regards to tankers you would be very hard pressed to find one that has done more than 20 years service. In my time there I knew of a couple (about 4 to 6) in my general area that have done more than 20 years, but when you are talking about a fleet of 1200+ tankers it is a very small number. At a guess I would say there would be less than 50 in service.

Saying this I have recently heard about a 20 year old tanker that has been retrofitted with a very high pressure hose reel. Reading between the lines this vehicle is going to be trialled blacking out at fires. I am guessing that it will not be called on for the initial attack.
dlcat1
150+ posts
150+ posts
Posts: 445
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 12:54 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: General fire discussions

Post by dlcat1 »

As I understand it, CFA has a 20 year age policy which prohibits appliances older than 20 years attending an incident unless it is purely to carry water. I think this was to get around the fact that some brigades had old big fill and bulk water appliances. I have seen older, ex cfa/dse appliances in use with private organisations though. If its mechanically sound and reliable and has adequate crew protection I don't have a problem with the age of the appliance, but am a sucker for a big aircon for summer and heater for winter.
philby
150+ posts
150+ posts
Posts: 266
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Coolgardie

Re: General fire discussions

Post by philby »

hey guys, Under what conditions do they consider it catastrophic fire conditions. ie MSLP <990?, ETC
gkoutlis
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5128
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 7:46 am

Re: General fire discussions

Post by gkoutlis »

philby wrote:hey guys, Under what conditions do they consider it catastrophic fire conditions. ie MSLP <990?, ETC
Hey Philby,

This should help you out :)

http://www.fesa.wa.gov.au/safetyinforma ... atings.pdf

G
George
WARSUG Moderator
VFRS Member

"I am not one who was born in the possession of knowledge. I am one who is fond of antiquity, and earnest in seeking it there." — Confucius

Image

Any views expressed in the above post are my own and do not necessarily depict or reflect the views or opinions of DFES/FRS or VBFB.
Helitak_670
WARSUG top poster
WARSUG top poster
Posts: 1056
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:56 pm
Location: Everywhere

Re: General fire discussions

Post by Helitak_670 »

Basically when the FDI goes above 99
pacestick
150+ posts
150+ posts
Posts: 242
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 3:55 pm
Scanners and Receivers: Pro handheld scanner
Bearcat scanner
Wuoxun
Location: Northam Shire

Re: General fire discussions

Post by pacestick »

Volunteer BFS.
VK6FIRE
kyeboi
150+ posts
150+ posts
Posts: 340
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:55 pm
Scanners and Receivers: UNIDEN UBC355XLT

Re: General fire discussions

Post by kyeboi »

hmmmmm i wonder how they will do it then theres a lot of area to cover and the will need a huge amount of appliences and personal it will be very intresting
KyeBoi

Yanchep VFRS
SgtSeedy
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 4:34 pm
Scanners and Receivers: 6AR
6IP
Ch11 (DEC)

Re: General fire discussions

Post by SgtSeedy »

interesting? more like a laugh. DEC's fire fighting capabilities are huge and are also regarded as one of the best in Australia. What does Gregson think he's going to do? Fill the left over ageing fleet at Forrestfield with volunteers and send them on there merry way to cover every bit of crown land in Western Australia. FESA is built on volunteers who take on a huge task as it is with there alocated Cat boundries and patches. Resourcing FESA to manage fire with in crown land and nat parks would be a huge effort and a burden that should not be shifted on to the volunteer, which seems to be a theme at FESA. I spose time will tell to see what wacko idea Gregson and Buswell have.
dlcat1
150+ posts
150+ posts
Posts: 445
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 12:54 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: General fire discussions

Post by dlcat1 »

I read it more along the lines of Gregson providing a politically useable answer to a probably unexpected question. I thought he was basically saying FESA stands ready to do whatever the government wants it to do, at the same time as not ruling anything out, he is not taking sides with the UFU, or against DEC, or saying anything the government is later going to have to spin a line on. It seems like it was the article that inferred he supported the UFU suggestion, which may have merit but seems to me to be motivated by politics.

Kinda sick of seeing organisations try to improve their power off the back of someone else's misfortune.
Helitak_670
WARSUG top poster
WARSUG top poster
Posts: 1056
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:56 pm
Location: Everywhere

Re: General fire discussions

Post by Helitak_670 »

Read it correctly.

DEC to loose "EMERGENCY" responsibility. Not the whole thing. Ie you will tend to see FESA run more incidents initially with the help of DEC.

example, a FESA DM/CFM arrives and due to lack of FESA resources he calls on DEC and I guess that is how the show will roll.
Post Reply