FESA frequencies

spartacus · Post by **spartacus** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 5:06 pm

Does anyone have the FESA/WAERN Frequency for SES in Sth Perth/Manning?

Cheers,
Sparts

WPXZBP · Post by **WPXZBP** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 5:31 pm

Look at the One Stop Shop at the top of the FESA Forum. There's a WAERN SES list there.

spartacus · Post by **spartacus** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 5:36 pm

WPXZBP wrote:Look at the One Stop Shop at the top of the FESA Forum. There's a WAERN SES list there.

Would I be correct in saying 162.8375, 164.000, 164.350 & 164.900? (I'm aware that One and Three are said as Department of Conservation and Environment)
Excuse the newbiness in this, but I'm new to this sort of stuff. Aren't some for FRS/FESA?

Nick · Post by **Nick** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 5:49 pm

I would also monitor the 10 SES UHF channels

spartacus · Post by **spartacus** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 5:59 pm

I've tried that with no luck

, thanks anyway.

treeny · Post by **treeny** » Mon Jul 06, 2009 6:41 pm

the best time to moniter ses channels are. mon, tues and wed nights after 1900 s thats when most units train, and during major storms as most units will be active.

Hotel Mike 107 · Post by **Hotel Mike 107** » Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:42 pm

Does anyone have the FESA Frequency for the Lockridge area

Post by **vk6hgr** » Sat Nov 28, 2009 8:29 pm

Hotel Mike 107 wrote:Does anyone have the FESA Frequency for the Lockridge area

Use the Red Hill channels. Ch57 VHF mid band or 306 on WAERN

(edited)

Hotel Mike 107 · Post by **Hotel Mike 107** » Sat Nov 28, 2009 8:43 pm

thanks i have tryed that but nothing umm the scanner i have is Uniden UBC72XLT would that help

Post by **yorky** » Sat Nov 28, 2009 11:22 pm

Try either 78.100 or 164.000 or 163.250 (306 there Gavin

)

Read the documents in the first post.

Post by **vk6hgr** » Sun Nov 29, 2009 12:04 am

yorky wrote:Try either 78.100 or 164.000 or 163.250 (306 there Gavin )

Whoops. Yep, you're right. Channel 57 is 78.125 and should be nice and strong in Lockridge... just down the road from my place.

Hotel Mike 107 · Post by **Hotel Mike 107** » Sun Nov 29, 2009 12:30 am

Thank you guys very much got it going niice and loud and really clear =D>

pacestick · Post by **pacestick** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 12:24 pm

Hi

Rescue 65 is going down to boddington area and are using our northam shire channelto talk to williams any idea why they would be using Ch 43 instead of another channel?

We are getting all the chatter from Rescue 65 over our repeater.

This happened last night and also at the moment 6/12/09.

colin · Post by **colin** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:07 pm

pacestick wrote:Hi

Rescue 65 is going down to boddington area and are using our northam shire channelto talk to williams any idea why they would be using Ch 43 instead of another channel?

We are getting all the chatter from Rescue 65 over our repeater.

This happened last night and also at the moment 6/12/09.

Perhaps Boddington/Williams also operate on Ch 43, and due to the altitude of Rescue 65, it was able to get line of sight with our repeater. i didn't hear this AM's chatter, but I don't recall hearing two sides of the conversation last night - heard enough to know that it wasn't a fire in Northam, made sure pager was nearby and turned radio off. one false alarm waking me up for the night was enough.

Post by **vk6hgr** » Sun Dec 06, 2009 4:31 pm

colin wrote: Perhaps Boddington/Williams also operate on Ch 43, and due to the altitude of Rescue 65, it was able to get line of sight with our repeater.

Probably.

The channel crowding of the VHF mid-band channels is one of the reasons FESA started WAERN, after all.

WA Radio Scanner Users' Group

FESA frequencies

Re: FESA frequencies

Re: FESA frequencies

Re: FESA frequencies

Re: FESA frequencies

Re: FESA frequencies

Re: FESA frequencies

Re: FESA frequencies

Re: FESA frequencies

Re: FESA frequencies

Re: FESA frequencies

Re: FESA frequencies

Re: FESA frequencies

Re: FESA frequencies

Re: FESA frequencies

Re: FESA frequencies