Page 5 of 21

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:54 pm
by WPXZBP
It *should* be accurate.... can't confirm though.

(yeah, and 2 should be 459, not 469)

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 3:50 pm
by robbage
robbage wrote:Does anybody know if this list is still accurate?
Correction... I meant to type that ↑↑↑

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 6:10 pm
by Nick
It is still accurate however ACMA do not list where all the sites are.

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 12:12 am
by Tyranus
The frequencies listed for channels 11-20 are all out put frequencies but used for any simplex work. I will have to obtain another copy of the repeater locations on Wednesday night.

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 9:35 am
by Blinky
Tyranus wrote:The frequencies listed for channels 11-20 are all out put frequencies but used for any simplex work. I will have to obtain another copy of the repeater locations on Wednesday night.
and the frequencies listed for 1-10 are transmit frequencies for repeater inputs. Not really much point listing those as you would only hear close activity. Best to put the 11-20 frequencies in your scanner and listen to repeater output and simplex activity.

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 4:43 pm
by robbage
Sweet. Outputs are what I had anyway. The repeater locations will be correct on the ACMA database I guess

Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:34 pm
by AVBFS
Did any one just hear what i heard after welshpool had finnished talking to 6AR i heard somone transmit the word *ignore* in a strange voice sounds like someones playing games there been inteference all day to.

Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:09 pm
by Smithy
while i was at station this morning i heard someone trying to transmit over 6ar/6ip. this is normal however this time it was longer and no one talking and seemed a bit odd

Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:39 pm
by AVBFS
Smithy wrote:while i was at station this morning i heard someone trying to transmit over 6ar/6ip. this is normal however this time it was longer and no one talking and seemed a bit odd
yer i heard the same thing it seams kinda strange.hmmm...

Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:55 pm
by robbage
Looks like they moved on from the amateur bands :? Unfortunately it's all too easy.

Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:00 pm
by Smithy
it isnt new. ive heard people on there before being d&%kheads. what can you do about it? nothing

Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:15 pm
by AVBFS
A couple years back we had like 10 fires all around the southwest Brunswick Collie and Lowden ect. we were at Roelands on the south western hwy. waiting for instuctions on where to go and we heard someone transmit "emergency emergency emergency water bomber down" so we stopped and took note well 5 mins after we heard all bombers do a role call and all bombers were present... hopefully the radio system will filter out some of the crap that go's on..

Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:45 pm
by Zebedee
Smithy wrote:it isnt new. ive heard people on there before being d&%kheads. what can you do about it? nothing
You and I ... not a lot. But as has been demonstrated recently with the people transmitting on amateur bands when they shouldn't ... they can be tracked and found, and the ACMA *will* take action.

So take comfort in the fact that sooner or later, they'll come unstuck in a big way ;)

Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:54 pm
by WPXZBP
Lets hope ACMA does take action. :?

Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:44 pm
by Tyranus
I should think if they take action for people intruding on amateurs they'll take action on people interfering on frequencies assigned to the emergency services.