Page 1 of 2

Margin for Error with regards to speed cameras.

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 4:19 pm
by herbie1204
I was followed by Police and pulled over for speeding in Bullsbrook last night. Without going into specifics (I will not make comment about the offence at the moment as it may be prejudicial to replies to the question), what is the margin for error in relation to the speed reading device used in this circumstance.

Re: Margin for Error with regards to speed cameras.

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 4:36 pm
by WPXZBP
I'd say zero.... speed and you'll get caught.

Re: Margin for Error with regards to speed cameras.

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 4:42 pm
by herbie1204
WPXZBP wrote:I'd say zero.... speed and you'll get caught.
I think you're getting the 2 terms tolerance and margin for error mixed up. I am asking about the margin for error.

Re: Margin for Error with regards to speed cameras.

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 5:45 pm
by Zebedee
As far as I'm aware, the in-car units (as you say you were followed by the police) are calibrated on a regular basis. So I would assume that the margin for error would only be slight, and that whatever tolerance they apply would take into account such a margin.

Long story short - if they claim you were speeding, there's every chance that you were. And even if you weren't, it's probably going to be too costly to fight. The path of least resistance is to pay the fine and get on with your life.

Re: Margin for Error with regards to speed cameras.

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 6:04 pm
by Tyranus
As Zebedee has said the officers regularly calibrate their speedo's, Radars, Lazers and camera's thus it's fair to say if you've been pulled over and booked for 10K's over the speed limit then you were doing 10 K's or very close to over the speed limit.

Re: Margin for Error with regards to speed cameras.

Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 6:09 pm
by Nafenn
not to mention that when setting up a Speed Camera, they test it with a radar gun to check that the camera is functioning propperly

Re: Margin for Error with regards to speed cameras.

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 5:55 pm
by written_ficton
Just pay the fine

Re: Margin for Error with regards to speed cameras.

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:06 pm
by woobla1
As the rest have said, if you go to a magistrates court and watch someone defend themselves for speeding
they are found guilty about 90% of the time. Bit like no one is guilty in prison right?.

I know it sucks, and it really will cost you less money + headache to just pay the fine and move on.
If you defend yourself, regardless if u win you will still be out of money probably 5x the original ticket price. Sucks but this is our system of justice and making the defendant pay some of the costs helps prevent frivolous lawsuits like in the US.

Besides are you always constantly watching the speedo + speed limits, like checking your speed every 5 seconds.

Re: Margin for Error with regards to speed cameras.

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:40 pm
by VK6LD
The manufacturers technical data sheet will specify the device's accuracy (usually -/+ 1 to 2km/h).

Re: Margin for Error with regards to speed cameras.

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 7:04 pm
by bakerboy
herbie1204 wrote: seeing as the car manufacturers are legally allowed to have their speedos out by 10%, i would assume that kind of margin when taking speeds
haha nice answer mate :lol:

seeing as the car manufacturers are legally allowed to have their speedos out by 10%, i would assume that kind of margin when taking speeds

yes the device may be more accurate, although they are only calibrated every 12months (or so im told) and the constant setting up, packing up, driving around jolting the equipment will put the instrument out, so the closer to retest date the least accurate, always ask to see the calibration certificate, to see how recently its been calibrated, they are delicate machines, slight bumps will decrease accuracy and you should be certain that its within accepted error margins

(im studying surveying at uni, so i have a background with EDMs and thier operations which is why i raised the point re:callibration certificate)

Re: Margin for Error with regards to speed cameras.

Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:56 pm
by Tyranus
I don't think the operator would appreciate you approaching them after you've been flashed, I think it wouldn't take long before you had the police around to remove you.

Re: Margin for Error with regards to speed cameras.

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 2:06 pm
by vk6hgr
I've got a GPS speedometer in my car and I've driven past multanovas at speedlimit + 5Kms and they haven't gone off. So I'd say the margin is at least speed limit + 5Kms :-)

The accuracy though is a different matter. Can't say I've ever been 'caught' speeding when I wasn't, though...

Re: Margin for Error with regards to speed cameras.

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 2:14 pm
by vk6hgr
bakerboy wrote: seeing as the car manufacturers are legally allowed to have their speedos out by 10%, i would assume that kind of margin when taking speeds

Not anymore. Although tolerances are much stricter on post-2006 cars, there's nothing that says that radar guns and cameras have to be calibrated within the same tolerances as car speedometers. (Radars are far more accurate, which sucks if your car's speedo reads low)

Re: Margin for Error with regards to speed cameras.

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 4:24 pm
by Nafenn
Tyranus wrote:I don't think the operator would appreciate you approaching them after you've been flashed, I think it wouldn't take long before you had the police around to remove you.
Especially given recent events

Re: Margin for Error with regards to speed cameras.

Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 5:55 pm
by Nick
ADR's state the speedometer is not allowed to read less than than the actual speed. Most car speedo's read 6% fast (as allowed by ADR's) but you will usually find the odometer says the correct distance. It is always safer to travel at the indicated speed. If in doubt use your navman or similar to check actual speed vs indicated speed.