Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 10:08 pm
sort of defeats the purpose of shooting him??playworth wrote:and then shot him and then deny him CPR.
Providing a voice for responsible scanner users in Western Australia
https://warsug.info/
sort of defeats the purpose of shooting him??playworth wrote:and then shot him and then deny him CPR.
Well as you seem to have all knowledge of the universe in your possession (sp?) perhaps you can find a way to turn that knowledge into fact. And then potentially avoid making yourself look a bit foolish?.Toottoot wrote:Well you must expect that if a team is being led by people displaying potentially corrupt behaviour, that is leading by example, that those who follow are only as good as the standards set for them. There are allegedly more than just two bad eggs in the force.
dunnno why they didnt bother to CPR him. he father was on his knee with the POI when dying... bad policing possiblywoobla1 wrote:sort of defeats the purpose of shooting him??playworth wrote:and then shot him and then deny him CPR.
Suggest methods to disarm someone who has stabbed you?jasonjag wrote:I disagree with the Courts and DPP of Acqitting a Police officer who shot at close range 4 times in the chest of the Victim who suffered with bipolar, who stabbed the officer in the arm with a knife, surely the 2 officers could have disarmed him by use of other methods. Ch 10 news.
After a car chase, then a foot chase of an offender, into a house you don’t even know he lives in – you’re going to stop and ask a person to settle the person down you’re chasing?Toottoot wrote:I agree JJ, also they should have listened to his dad and got his dad to help to at least try and settle him down. That poor boy.
Guns are evil.
It is well known people are capable of continuing their intended actions, despite being shot.jasonjag wrote: Even so, Toottoot is right, guns are evil, but if the officer had fired one, would that not have been enough to slow the victim down, and another view, couldnt the officer move back or away until support arrived, to me he just went in blazing away like in the movies, I feel so sorry for the family and the poor victim. no I do not know the concequences leeding up to it, but my view is still the same.
After a car chase, then a foot chase of an offender, into a house you don’t even know he lives in – you’re going to stop and ask a person to settle the person down you’re chasing? Sound familiar?Toottoot wrote: His father wasn't consulted. From what I understand of the situation he was brushed aside, when he could have helped calm him down perhaps.
Was he dying or dead? Those two are very different – be sure you know what you’re talking about.Toottoot wrote:Like denying a dying man access to a doctor who was waiting at the gate asking to be let in?????????
And who are you to judge? Quiet clearly which has been portrayed by your comments - nobody.Toottoot wrote:Your the fool. Nobody suggested that it was right to stab the officer. Just remember, people are judged not by what happens to them but how they choose to react to the situation.
Offender.BLiNG wrote:I think the word you are looking for here is suspect, not victim.jasonjag wrote:I feel so sorry for the family and the poor victim.
Which is a shame, because the type you’re tarnishing are the poor men and women who will still rush to your distress call – trying to do the right thing.Toottoot wrote:I am sorry that you find the comment "Like denying a dying man access to a doctor who was waiting at the gate asking to be let in?????????" not real.
Perhaps you live some land far detached from the reality that the rest of us know.
Of course it is hard to have faith in a police force which promoted two officers to assistant commissioners, which have since been stood aside for their role in wrongfully sending a man to jail for 12 years, despite the efforts of those officers who act in good faith.
You never know which type is behind each uniform.
Who alleges that? You? Who are you? Nobody as well? Where does it say within any WAPol document to ‘lead by example’? Is that an armchair critic quote? I think you may want to replace that with “learn from others mistakesâ€Toottoot wrote:Well you must expect that if a team is being led by people displaying potentially corrupt behaviour, that is leading by example, that those who follow are only as good as the standards set for them. There are allegedly more than just two bad eggs in the force.
Seconded!Zebedee wrote:Ryno,
I have nothing further to add other than "well said".