Parkerville 3.4U

Pictures of emergency service vehicles, radio equipment etc
Post Reply
auntys_eyes
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1628
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:15 am
Location: Greenmount

Parkerville 3.4U

Post by auntys_eyes »

Took these snaps of the Parkerville 3.4U at the Mundaring Fire School.

Image

Image

Image
WARSUG Moderator - Media Section

VBFB Member

No onion, no garlic, no chilli, no pepper... NO POINT!!
gkoutlis
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5128
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 7:46 am

Re: Parkerville 3.4U

Post by gkoutlis »

Great pics AE - thanks for sharing..

G 8)
George
WARSUG Moderator
VFRS Member

"I am not one who was born in the possession of knowledge. I am one who is fond of antiquity, and earnest in seeking it there." — Confucius

Image

Any views expressed in the above post are my own and do not necessarily depict or reflect the views or opinions of DFES/FRS or VBFB.
treeny
150+ posts
150+ posts
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 6:51 pm
Location: City of Canning

Re: Parkerville 3.4U

Post by treeny »

Based on a DEC heavy duty appliance, and i correct? or is the other way? Nice photos AE
MELVILLE 80
The worst in nature brings out the best in us! STATE EMERGENCY SERVICE WE SERVE
Fastlane
WARSUG top poster
WARSUG top poster
Posts: 1658
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:24 pm
Amateur callsign: VK6FLMZ

Re: Parkerville 3.4U

Post by Fastlane »

treeny wrote:Based on a DEC heavy duty appliance, and i correct? or is the other way? Nice photos AE
Completely different!
treeny
150+ posts
150+ posts
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 6:51 pm
Location: City of Canning

Re: Parkerville 3.4U

Post by treeny »

I gather that they are different in regards to the equipment on board, but would they not be the same type of truck with a similar build on the back? or is it the 4.4 thats based on the DEC appliance.
MELVILLE 80
The worst in nature brings out the best in us! STATE EMERGENCY SERVICE WE SERVE
Fastlane
WARSUG top poster
WARSUG top poster
Posts: 1658
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:24 pm
Amateur callsign: VK6FLMZ

Re: Parkerville 3.4U

Post by Fastlane »

Neither are based on the DEC appliances. Both the 4.4 and 3.4U use a PTO pump - DEC appliances don't use these.

The *old* 3.4R's and the DEC heavy appliances are almost identical - built by the same company.
treeny
150+ posts
150+ posts
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 6:51 pm
Location: City of Canning

Re: Parkerville 3.4U

Post by treeny »

ahk, coz the fesa website says the 4.4 is based on the CALM appliance. this must be the old one seeing as tho its still listed as CALM. cheers fastlane.
MELVILLE 80
The worst in nature brings out the best in us! STATE EMERGENCY SERVICE WE SERVE
Hotel Mike 107
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:03 pm
Scanners and Receivers: Uniden
UBC72XLT

Re: Parkerville 3.4U

Post by Hotel Mike 107 »

Awesome Piks :D
kylep
150+ posts
150+ posts
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 5:16 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Parkerville 3.4U

Post by kylep »

Do they teach you about locker numbering in BFS? Those numbers are totally different to FRS, and any other system I've seen. If not done the FRS way they still usually start the numbers on the near side.
Fastlane
WARSUG top poster
WARSUG top poster
Posts: 1658
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 4:24 pm
Amateur callsign: VK6FLMZ

Re: Parkerville 3.4U

Post by Fastlane »

1 and 3 should be nearside, 2 and 4 offside (working from back to front). It's not a BFS thing - I'd just say its been numbered incorrectly.

(at least Locker 3 is numbered correctly!)
written_ficton
WARSUG top poster
WARSUG top poster
Posts: 2716
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:08 pm

Re: Parkerville 3.4U

Post by written_ficton »

Fastlane wrote:Neither are based on the DEC appliances. Both the 4.4 and 3.4U use a PTO pump - DEC appliances don't use these.

The *old* 3.4R's and the DEC heavy appliances are almost identical - built by the same company.
Quoted on the FESA website, mentioned its based on a DEC appliance
I've closed the door!
WPXZBP

Re: Parkerville 3.4U

Post by WPXZBP »

The info on the FESA website has been the same for at least 4 years. Needs updating.
observer
150+ posts
150+ posts
Posts: 152
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:14 am

Re: Parkerville 3.4U

Post by observer »

written_ficton wrote:
Fastlane wrote:Neither are based on the DEC appliances. Both the 4.4 and 3.4U use a PTO pump - DEC appliances don't use these.

The *old* 3.4R's and the DEC heavy appliances are almost identical - built by the same company.
Quoted on the FESA website, mentioned its based on a DEC appliance
To quote from the FESA website for a 3.4U
The 3.4 Urban Tanker has an operating crew of six (6) carries the necessary fire fighting equipment to the fireground, where it can be used to pump water from the tank, open water and street mains. The vehicle is suitable for larger townsite protection, is capable of carrying Breathing Apparatus and is ideal for broadacre / rural / bush fire fighting.
http://www.fesa.wa.gov.au/internet/?Men ... tentID=259

No mention of DEC or CALM appliance here.

Now to quote for a 2.4R
The 2.4 Rural Tanker has an operating crew of three (3) or six (6), carries the necessary fire fighting equipment and is based on the CALM Heavy Duty Appliance. It is ideal for broadacre / rural / bush fire fighting and has limited structural fire fighting capacity.
http://www.fesa.wa.gov.au/internet/?Men ... tentID=255

It appears you are confusing the 3.4U (U=Urban) to a 2.4R or a 4.4R (R=Rural).

Wes, even though the info from the web site is 3-4 years old, they may still be building the trucks like this (however not too sure. This area has not been updated for some time)
written_ficton
WARSUG top poster
WARSUG top poster
Posts: 2716
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:08 pm

Re: Parkerville 3.4U

Post by written_ficton »

WPXZBP wrote:The info on the FESA website has been the same for at least 4 years. Needs updating.
Fair Call WPXZBP
I've closed the door!
kylep
150+ posts
150+ posts
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 5:16 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Parkerville 3.4U

Post by kylep »

Fastlane wrote:1 and 3 should be nearside, 2 and 4 offside (working from back to front). It's not a BFS thing - I'd just say its been numbered incorrectly.

(at least Locker 3 is numbered correctly!)
Ta.
From what you're saying then the BFS use the same system as FRS. That is odds on the near side, evens on the off side, and start the numbers from the back.
Post Reply