Page 6 of 6

Re: Virgin Blue

Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:10 pm
by Helitak_670
I managed to have a look and take some photos. Nice as interior and will certainly give Qantas a run for their money.

Re: Virgin Blue

Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 12:32 pm
by dlcat1
Do we need to rename this thread now? :)

http://www.watoday.com.au/business/bran ... rom=age_ft

Re: Virgin Blue

Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 12:36 pm
by Infernal
Not really, that livery has about as much character as a flat battery

Re: Virgin Blue

Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 3:37 pm
by dlcat1
AO11912 wrote:Not really, that livery has about as much character as a flat battery
I think I know what you mean. No doubt in time I'll get used to it, and it possibly looks better in the flesh than on a news site, but I will miss the VB livery.

Re: Virgin Blue

Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 6:54 pm
by Nafenn
dlcat1 wrote:
AO11912 wrote:Not really, that livery has about as much character as a flat battery
I think I know what you mean. No doubt in time I'll get used to it, and it possibly looks better in the flesh than on a news site, but I will miss the VB livery.
Image

VH-YFC in sydney

Re: Virgin Blue

Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 7:00 pm
by Infernal
http://a330-virtual-tour.virginblue.com.au/
Virtual Tour of the A330

Why do they have 2-3-2 in the business class? thought they were doing 2-2-2

Re: Virgin Blue

Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 6:06 pm
by written_ficton
AO11912 wrote:http://a330-virtual-tour.virginblue.com.au/
Virtual Tour of the A330

Why do they have 2-3-2 in the business class? thought they were doing 2-2-2
They are... Because it was such a rush to put the aircraft into service it was decided to keep the 2-3-2 in business class for the time being until the new production models come on line.

However, I doubt most punters will complain. Hell of a lot more spacious than what QF offer on their domestic product

Re: Virgin Blue

Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 6:11 pm
by Infernal
QF plan to have all their A330's re configured to 2-2-2 by the end of the year

Re: Virgin Australia

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:31 pm
by written_ficton
Virgin Australia looking for alliance with Singapore Airlines

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/busines ... 6070741209

And on another battlefront, Virgin Australia's newest ATR72-500 [212A]

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Virgin-A ... 1931816/L/

Re: Virgin Australia

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 8:01 pm
by Boeta
written_ficton wrote:Virgin Australia's newest ATR72-500
Looks awesome, even with THAT livery!
But it begs the question... will any of them be painted up in Skywest livery??

Re: Virgin Australia

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 8:07 pm
by Infernal
Boeta wrote:
written_ficton wrote:Virgin Australia's newest ATR72-500
Looks awesome, even with THAT livery!
But it begs the question... will any of them be painted up in Skywest livery??

No because Virgin owns them, and will be using them on the east coast before wet leasing them to Skywest
A wet lease is a leasing arrangement whereby one airline (lessor(Virgin)) provides an aircraft, complete crew, maintenance, and insurance (ACMI) to another airline (lessee(Skywest)), which pays by hours operated. The lessee (skywest) provides fuel and covers airport fees, and any other duties, taxes, etc. The flight uses the flight number of the lessee(Skywest).

Re: Virgin Australia

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 8:21 pm
by written_ficton
AO11912 wrote:
No because Virgin owns them, and will be using them on the east coast before wet leasing them to Skywest
Note quite true AO11912. The commercial agreement between Virgin & Skywest sees the ATR72's belong/owned by Skywest and wet leased to Virgin Australia.

However, there may be ATR72's flying in Skywest's own livery before we know it?