Pub Argument on Security Guards.
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 2:15 pm
Hi everyone,
I've got into a bit of a, let's say 'disagreement', with someone else about Security Guards powers. By this I mean, regular patrol companies, not Transperth/Transit etc.
I'm under the impression that at the end of the day, they are still a citizen with no extraordinary powers of the law, but are there more as a deterrent, but also to deal with an incident as much as they can. He's under the impression that they are basically 'private police' that basically are police up until the point where 'actual' police arrive. I know this isn't the case, because we've had that discussion here previously, but my question is, what are their powers?
The issue of armaments also came up. I'm under the impression that they can't kit themselves with Glocks & Tasers, yet I have seen some with OC and Handcuffs. What is and isn't allowed?
Disclaimer: Obviously, I'm not looking for any legal advise, and I don't expect that on a public forum.
Thankyou
I've got into a bit of a, let's say 'disagreement', with someone else about Security Guards powers. By this I mean, regular patrol companies, not Transperth/Transit etc.
I'm under the impression that at the end of the day, they are still a citizen with no extraordinary powers of the law, but are there more as a deterrent, but also to deal with an incident as much as they can. He's under the impression that they are basically 'private police' that basically are police up until the point where 'actual' police arrive. I know this isn't the case, because we've had that discussion here previously, but my question is, what are their powers?
The issue of armaments also came up. I'm under the impression that they can't kit themselves with Glocks & Tasers, yet I have seen some with OC and Handcuffs. What is and isn't allowed?
Disclaimer: Obviously, I'm not looking for any legal advise, and I don't expect that on a public forum.
Thankyou